SDTMIG 3.1.1
A full detailed difference test can be viewed but among some of the findings include differences between the lengths and labels such as:
Base | C:\cdisc\data_3.1.1_template | DM | armcd | C | 8* | Planned Arm Code* |
Compare | C:\cdisc\data_3.1.1_template | TA | armcd | C | 7* | Arm Code* |
Base | C:\cdisc\data_3.1.1_template | DM | arm | C | 14* | Description of Planned Arm* |
Compare | C:\cdisc\data_3.1.1_template | TA | arm | C | 10* | Description of Arm* |
SDTMIG 3.1.2
I then compared differences just within the new 3.1.2 and found some differences. The detailed report is available. In my case, I just found an in consistent label between variables as in:
Data Path | Data Name | Variable | Type | Length | Label | |
Base | C:\cdisc\data_3.1.2 | SV | visitnum | N | 8 | Visit Number* |
Compare | C:\cdisc\data_3.1.2 | TV | visitnum | N | 8 | Visit Sequence Number* |
A comparison between the 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 is available in a detailed report. Some of the findings include label differences include:
Base | C:\cdisc\data_3.1.1_template | DM | age | N | 8 | Age in AGEU at RFSTDTC* |
Compare | C:\cdisc\data_3.1.2 | DM | age | N | 8 | Age* |
I will plan to summarize these and send it in for suggestions. Since this is in draft mode, I hope they will incorporate these changes into the final version to make things more consistent.
No comments:
Post a Comment